Original Source
Iran Rejects Temporary Ceasefire, Demands Permanent End to War and Compensation
Iran Rejects Temporary Ceasefire, Demands Permanent End to War
Iran has decisively rejected any notion of a temporary ceasefire, instead advocating for a permanent end to the conflict in the West Asia region, coupled with firm guarantees and compensation for damages incurred. In an interview with a Japanese agency, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that Iran is open to listening to proposals and discussing them, but will not agree to a ceasefire that risks a repeat of past escalations. He stressed that Iran's actions are in self-defense and will continue as long as necessary.
Iran's Conditions for Ending the Conflict
Minister Araghchi welcomed any initiative that could lead to a complete cessation of the ongoing war. The core demands from Iran include a permanent end to the conflict and compensation for the damages inflicted upon the nation. This stance highlights a distrust of temporary solutions, stemming from previous ceasefires that ultimately led to renewed hostilities. The broader question remains whether United States President Donald Trump is prepared to agree to these terms, which would entail a complete cessation of aggression against Iran.
Potential Mediators and Global Economic Impact
Countries such as Oman have been identified as potential mediators in the ongoing tensions between the US and Iran, having played similar roles in the past. However, the critical uncertainty lies in President Trump's willingness to accept a permanent end to the war, rather than a temporary truce. Iran argues that previous ceasefires, whether related to US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites or missile exchanges between Iran and Israel, failed to prevent subsequent escalations. The international community continues to monitor the situation, mindful of the potential for further devastation to the global economy should the conflict persist.
*Source: YouTube: NDTV (2026-03-21)*
